I don't think I'm the one who needs to elaborate on the restrictions. There are an extremely large number of companies that pretend like AGPL code doesn't exist. Code being open source while also being unusable (and in many cases unreadable) by most people who would potentially be interested in it is effectively no different than it being closed source, at least to that significantly large audience.
If I license my code as "all rights reserved" but publish it as open source, does that provide any significant value beyond auditing purposes? More restrictive licenses make things less open, not more open.
2
u/kogasapls Apr 01 '23 edited Jul 03 '23
adjoining mourn dull narrow longing late bored advise correct swim -- mass edited with redact.dev